INTELLECTUAL HUSL℠
  • INTELLECTUAL HUSL
  • IP Law Blog
  • Fashion Law Blog
  • Prof. M. Terrell
  • Contact

Howard law school IP CLINIC BLOG

Strange Music vs. Strainge Entertainment

10/24/2017

1 Comment

 

By: Rishele Ellison

“Strange Music,” founded by well-known Kansas City rap artists Tech N9ne in 1999, filed a trademark infringement claim against the newly formed California record label “Strainge Entertainment,” which is headed by founder Elliot Grainge, the son of Universal Music Group chairman/CEO Lucian Grainge. 
 
Strange Music filed the suit in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri claiming that the new competitor is confusing rap and hip-hop consumers through the use of similar trademarks. In the 24-page lawsuit filed by Strange Music, they allege that Strainge violated Strange Music’s intellectual property rights by “unlawfully adopting the STRAINGE Marks, which are confusingly similar to the STRANGE Marks as used in connection with identical goods and services in the music industry.” They furthered their allegation by stating that “consumers are already confused, and are likely to continue to be confused.” Strange Music also contends that CEOs of Strainge Entertainment offered Stange Music an opportunity to join their distribution company, Caroline, but Strange Music wasn’t interested.
 
The suit further states that “Strainge Entertainment adopted the Strainge Marks egregiously, willfully, and intentionally to try to capitalize on Strange Music’s notoriety, goodwill, and reputation in the music industry.” In addition to a preliminary and permanent injunction against Strainge Entertainment, Strange is seeking actual damages (“in an amount to be proven at trial”) to include legal costs and attorneys’ fees. 
Being that Strange Music was used in commerce in 1999, well before “Strainge Music” was conceived, it seems that this a is a clear open and shut case.  But, for good measure, let’s compare the facts.
 
Strange Music
  • Founded in 1999
  • Signed over 17 artists since its existence
  • Released over 50 albums since its existence
  • Filed for Trademark in December 2009
  • Registered in 2011
 
Strainge Music
  • Founded in 2016
  • Signed 5 artists
  • Has not filed for any trademark registration as of October 19, 2017
 
So, what is trademark infringement?  To put it simply, trademark infringement is present when there is a likelihood of confusion between two different marks used in commerce to identity similar goods and/or services. A party that files for trademark infringement (Strange Music, in this instance) has the burden of proof of demonstrating that the owner of the mark (1) has a protectable interest in the mark, and that (2) the opposing party’s use of their mark is likely to cause consumer confusion.
 
When determining whether a mark has the potential to cause a likelihood of confusion with another registered mark is through the Sound, Appearance, Meaning (S.A.M.) analysis.  Thus, we will start with sound. “Strange” and “Strainge” definitely sound the same. Appearance wise, the two words look identical enough to be confusing.  The “i” looks like a typo, and the addition of one letter doesn’t change the appearance of the word enough to make any significant difference.  As for the meaning? This is where things can get tricky! As of today, “strainge” is not recognized as an actual word in the English dictionary.  However, due to it’s phonetic pronunciation, it’s likely that the owner of the mark intended for people to associate their variation of the word “strainge” with the English word “strange.”  If that were the case, then it would mean that they would indeed have the same meaning.  Despite the idea that the names may have different origins, the mere fact that they’re both in the entertainment industry gives them the same objective, mission, and, dare I say, meaning.
 
Personally, it seems highly unlikely that Strainge Entertainment would win this case.  Even if Strainge Music attempted to trademark its name at this point, their application has a high likelihood of rejection by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).
 
Representatives for Strainge Entertainment have been contacted but have offered no statement on this matter.
 

1 Comment
Barbour
6/3/2018 03:34:44 pm

my client has a trademark infringement case we are trying to resolve with Sony. If you can assist in anyway we would love to speak with you.
We can be reached at either (914) 441-4599 (office) or (917) 531-1016 (direct).

We thank you in advance for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,
Petite Lovelace

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    November 2019
    October 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    November 2018
    September 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    July 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    November 2016
    December 2015

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
  • INTELLECTUAL HUSL
  • IP Law Blog
  • Fashion Law Blog
  • Prof. M. Terrell
  • Contact